Trusted by 650+ Clients

McDonald's
Ernst & Young
Sopra Steria
BDO
Wipro
L&T
Airtel
ASTEMO
McDonald's
Ernst & Young
Sopra Steria
BDO
Wipro
L&T
Airtel
ASTEMO
McDonald's
Ernst & Young
Sopra Steria
BDO
Wipro
L&T
Airtel
ASTEMO

Overview: SOC 2 Compliance

Introduced by AICPA in 2010, SOC 2 is a framework that helps service providers protect data and client privacy. Based on five trust principles – security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy – it applies to SaaS companies, vendors, and third-party partners.

Current Version
A licensed CPA firm registered with the AICPA – ✓ an attestation report, not a certificate
Framework
AICPA Trust Services Criteria
Criteria
Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy
Mandatory
Security only (Common Criteria CC1–CC9). The other four are scoped by choice
Report Types
Type 1 (Control design at a point in time);  Type 2 (Operating effectiveness over a period)
Type 2 Observation Window
Minimum 3 months; 6 - 12 months typically expected by enterprise buyers
Report Validity
Treated as current for 12 months; annual renewal

SOC 2 Attestation – Choosing Your Trust Services Criteria

SOC 2 scope is set by which of the five Trust Services Criteria you include. Security is the only one required in every report. The other four are added based on what you commit to customers and what your buyers actually ask for.

TSCRequirementScope In When
Security (CC1–CC9)AlwaysEvery SOC 2 Report. Also called the Common Criteria
AvailabilityOptionalYou carry uptime SLAs or service credits
ConfidentialityOptionalYou handle customer trade secrets, contract or M&A data
Processing IntegrityOptionalYou process transactions where accuracy is the product, like payments, payroll, billing
PrivacyOptionalYou handle personal information across its lifecycle

Scope discipline is the main lever on cost and timeline. Each additional criterion adds controls, evidence and audit hours. Most first-time SaaS organisations scope Security alone, or Security plus Confidentiality and Availability.

Criteria can be added in a later cycle without starting over. The Common Criteria evidence carries forward. Over-scoping the first report is the most common and most expensive mistake we see.

SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2

A Type 1 shows the controls you designed. A Type 2 shows that you operated them: auditors sampled access reviews that were genuinely performed each month along with the tickets closed, and alerts the alerts triaged.

Type 1
Basis
Type 2
Control design at a single date
Tests
Control design and operating effectiveness over a period
Point in time
Period
Observation window, minimum 3 months
Current state
Evidence
Sampled across the entire window
Lower
Cost
Higher
Sometimes accepted as an interim signal
Buyer Acceptance
What enterprise procurement actually asks for
ParticularsSOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2
TestsControl design at a single dateControl design and operating effectiveness over a period
PeriodPoint in timeObservation window, minimum 3 months
EvidenceCurrent stateSampled across the entire window
CostLowerHigher
Buyer AcceptanceSometimes accepted as an interim signalWhat enterprise procurement actually asks for

The observation window cannot be compressed. It is the one part of a SOC 2 timeline that money cannot shorten, which is why timeline, not fee, is usually the real pressure when a deal is waiting on a report.

Understanding The SOC 2 Report

A SOC 2 report contains the CPA firm's formal opinion. There are four:

Unqualified

Unqualified

Controls were designed and, for Type 2, operated effectively with no material exceptions. The outcome organizations want.

Qualified

Qualified

Controls were broadly effective, but specific exceptions were identified and are named in the report.

Adverse

Adverse

Controls were largely ineffective.

Disclaimer of opinion

Disclaimer of opinion

The auditor could not form a conclusion, usually from insufficient evidence or access.

A qualified opinion is not automatically deal-breaking. Exceptions appear in the report alongside a management response, and buyers generally accept a named exception with a credible, dated remediation plan. Kratikal's role is to make sure nothing in the report is a surprise to you.

Kratikal's Approach to SOC 2 Compliance

01

GAP Assessment

Gap Assessment compares an organization’s current security posture with industry standards and SOC 2 requirements. It prepares organizations for the SOC 2 process by identifying gaps, providing essential insights, and recommending controls needed to address deficiencies.

02

Policy Drafting

SOC 2 outlines how to handle a customer's data using five principles: integrity, confidentiality, availability, and privacy. Information security, access control, risk assessment, mitigation, incident policy, and other policies must be documented to obtain SOC 2 attestation.

03

Implementation

This evaluation ensures drafted policies are implemented and followed across the organization while strengthening reporting and attestation. Its findings help classify threats by risk level, enabling organizations to take appropriate and timely corrective action.

04

Auditing and Reporting

After completing the above stages, your organization is prepared for CPA audit fieldwork. The audit thoroughly evaluates SOC 2 compliance, identifies areas needing attention, and verifies control effectiveness over time. Type 2 audits typically take longer than Type 1 due to the operational evidence.

05

Attestation

Finally, we help you complete the SOC 2 attestation by reviewing documentation requirements and validating control implementation. A licensed CPA firm then issues the SOC 2 attestation report, providing its formal opinion on your organization’s controls.

Why Do Organizations Need SOC 2 Compliance?

SOC 2 is not mandated by Indian law, but it is often required by customers, partners, and global buyers. Without it, organizations may face longer sales cycles, lost business opportunities, and reduced customer trust.

Who Needs SOC 2 Attestation?

B2B SaaS

B2B SaaS

Healthcare

Healthcare

Fintech and Payments

Fintech and Payments

IT Services, BPO and KPO

IT Services, BPO and KPO

Data, Analytics and AI Vendors

Data, Analytics and AI Vendors

Processing US Customer Data as a Sub-Processor

Processing US Customer Data as a Sub-Processor

Our Trust Block

Compliance Projects Completed
SME's & Enterprises Served

Client Testimonials

★★★★★

We sincerely appreciate the support provided by Kratikal in helping us successfully achieve compliance with the SOC 2 Type 2 Report. Your team's expertise, timely guidance, and thorough approach played a crucial role in this accomplishment. Thank you for being a dependable partner in our compliance journey.

Divyanshi SinghInformation Security Analyst, ObserveID, Inc.
★★★★★

We appreciate the effort and thoroughness applied in conducting the SOC 2 Type II audit and preparing the corresponding report. The report provides a comprehensive evaluation of our internal controls relevant to the Trust Services Criteria, particularly Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity and Privacy. Overall, the SOC 2 report effectively demonstrates the maturity and reliability of our control environment. We thank the audit team for their diligence and professionalism throughout the engagement.

Amutha LAssistant Manager Information security,
Uncia Technologies Private Limited

Benefits

Stronger Security Posture

Stronger Security Posture

Routine access reviews, change management, and incident response strengthen security with consistent monthly evidence.

Greater Customer Assurance

Greater Customer Assurance

Independent CPA assurance validates your controls and strengthens customer confidence in data security.

Faster Enterprise Sales

Faster Enterprise Sales

A SOC 2 report streamlines security reviews, reducing questionnaires, follow-ups, and evidence collection.

Reusable Compliance Foundation

Reusable Compliance Foundation

Shared controls simplify future compliance with ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR frameworks.

FAQs

Readiness takes 3 to 6 months. Type 1 follows shortly after. Type 2 adds an observation window of 3 to 12 months, so expect 6 to 12 months total.

No. SOC 2 is an attestation. A licensed CPA firm examines your controls and issues a report containing its opinion. There is no certificate and no certifying body.

No. Type 1 is optional and you can go directly to Type 2. Type 1 helps when you need a shareable report quickly. Enterprise buyers want Type 2 regardless.

No. That is an ISO 27001 document. SOC 2 uses a system description and an RFI tracker mapping evidence to the Trust Services Criteria you select.

Security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy. Security is the only one required in every report. The other four are optional, scoped to your customer commitments.

There is no formal expiry, but the market treats reports as current for twelve months from the observation period's end. Older reports need a bridge letter or fresh audit.

A management statement covering the gap between your last report and the next observation window, confirming no material control changes. It is a stopgap, not a current report.

SOC 1 covers financial reporting controls. SOC 2 covers the Trust Services Criteria and is what enterprise buyers request. SOC 3 is a public summary, not a substitute.

Four: unqualified (no material exceptions), qualified (specific exceptions identified), adverse (controls largely ineffective), and disclaimer (auditor could not conclude). A qualified opinion needs a documented remediation plan.

SOC 2 is a US-oriented annual attestation report. ISO 27001 is a three-year international certificate. Controls overlap heavily. The answer usually depends on where your buyers are.

No law requires it. The demand comes from buyers: US and European enterprises routinely require a SOC 2 Type 2 report before onboarding Indian vendors.