EVENTSTESTIMONIALSvCISO
Picture of the author
Kratikal's Logo
Investor Relations
Contact Us

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Build Secure Applications from the Inside Out

“If your organization builds or maintains web or mobile applications, YOU need to implement SAST.

Get a FREE Security Consultation

Phone

Overview

What is the cost of insecure code? Every line of code your developers write contributes to your business’s digital DNA. But even a single insecure line can expose your organization to catastrophic risks. The risks include data breaches, compliance penalties, reputational loss and many more. Today, over 90%of web applications are vulnerable to at least one security flaw before release. According to the VDRI Report, nearly 43% of all breaches stem from application vulnerabilities.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is the first line of defense against these risks. It’s how leading organizations identify and fix security flaws before an application ever goes live. At Kratikal, we go beyond scans. Our Secure Code Review and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) methodologies combine automation with expert manual analysis to uncover even the most subtle vulnerabilities that machines miss.

We Are Trusted By Many!

Paasa
Emoha
Finagg
HTC Global Services
AGB
Airtel

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) - A Brief

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a security practice that analyzes the source code, bytecode, or binaries of an application to detect vulnerabilities early in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Unlike dynamic testing, SAST doesn’t need a running application; it inspects the code itself, identifying weaknesses.

SAST brief

Common Vulnerabilities Detected Through SAST

Injection Flaws

Injection Flaws

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

Hardcoded Secrets and Credentials

Hardcoded Secrets and Credentials

Insecure Deserialization

Insecure Deserialization

Command Injection

Command Injection

Authentication and Authorization Flaws

Authentication and Authorization Flaws

Cryptographic Misuse

Cryptographic Misuse

Input Validation and Output Encoding Issues

Input Validation and Output Encoding Issues

Insecure API Implementation

Insecure API Implementation

Buffer Overflows

Buffer Overflows

Security Misconfigurations

Security Misconfigurations

Insecure Third-party Components

Insecure Third-party Components

Why Organizations Need SAST?

Prevention Is Cheaper Than Remediation

Prevention Is Cheaper Than Remediation

According to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report, fixing vulnerabilities in production costs 6x more than fixing them during development. SAST helps you find and resolve vulnerabilities before deployment, saving time, money, and reputation.

Prevention Is Cheaper Than Remediation

Developers Get Actionable Feedback

SAST doesn’t just flag issues; it maps them directly to the affected lines of code. This gives developers precise, actionable feedback to strengthen security without slowing delivery.

Prevention Is Cheaper Than Remediation

Continuous Integration with CI/CD

Modern DevOps pipelines demand continuous testing. SAST integrates seamlessly with CI/CD environments like Jenkins, enabling automated security checks every time code changes.

Prevention Is Cheaper Than Remediation

Standard and Regulatory Compliance Requirements

Most of the standard and regulatory compliances mandate secure coding practices. SAST ensures compliance readiness and audit transparency.

Prevention Is Cheaper Than Remediation

Builds Customer and Stakeholder Trust

When your applications are secure by design, users trust you more. A secure product is an organization’s competitive advantage.

Difference Between Secure Delivery and Avoidable
Breach - Key Statistics

0%

of applications contain at least one critical
security flaw at initial testing.

0%

of developers admit to using open-source components without verifying security.

0%

of vulnerabilities discovered post-deployment could have been identified through early SAST.

30-30%

faster remediation times with SAST + DAST, compared to those relying only on DAST.

0%

reduction in security-related defects during code reviews through regular SAST adoption.

Letting it Skip? Here’s the Risk for Ignoring SAST

Not performing SAST can have direct and long-term consequences. Here’s what
organizations risk by skipping secure code analysis.

Data Breaches

Data Breaches

Hackers exploit insecure code to gain access to sensitive systems.

Data Breaches

Financial Loss and Regulatory Penalties

The average cost of a data breach has crossed ~$4.44 million and non-compliance always results in hefty fines.

Data Breaches

Reputation Damage

Customers lose trust, partners lose confidence, and your brand takes a lasting hit.

Data Breaches

Operational Downtime

Breaches can lead to service disruption, loss of productivity, and emergency response costs.

“If you don’t find your code’s vulnerabilities, someone else will.”

Kratikal’s Approach to SAST

At Kratikal, we take a hybrid approach to SAST. Our security experts dive deep into your codebase to uncover hidden risks that scanners overlook. We break down SAST into two complementary services:

01Secure Code Review

02Secure Code Review

Each plays a distinct role in protecting your application from within.

Secure Code Review

Kratikal’s Secure Code Review service thoroughly analyzes your application’s source code to uncover flaws that automated tools might miss. We follow a structured methodology to ensure full coverage and actionable insights.

Our Approach

Scope Icon

We begin by mapping your application’s architecture. Using advanced automated scanning tools, we identify:

  • Programming languages
  • Frameworks
  • Dependencies
  • Codebase structure

This foundation helps us understand where risks are most likely to reside and how attackers might exploit them.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Modern applications rely heavily on open-source and third-party libraries. While these speed up development, they also introduce external risks like known vulnerabilities, outdated components, and licensing conflicts. Kratikal’s Software Composition Analysis (SCA) identifies and mitigates these risks by examining all external components integrated into your software.

Our Approach

Scope Icon

We start by scanning your codebase to identify:

  • Executive Summary
  • Third-party libraries
  • Open-source components
  • Affected Lines of Code
  • Framework versions and dependencies

This builds an inventory of your application’s software supply chain, which is a prerequisite for effective vulnerability management.

Why Kratikal for SAST?

The world’s most secure organizations understand one truth:Security must start where the code
starts.
By integrating Kratikal’s Static Application Security Testing (SAST) into your SDLC, you:

Comprehensive Coverage

Prevent vulnerabilities before release

Comprehensive Coverage

Reduce post-deployment incidents

Comprehensive Coverage

Strengthen compliance posture

Comprehensive Coverage

Empower developers with secure coding knowledge

Comprehensive Coverage

Build customer confidence and brand credibility

Kratikal’s proven expertise for SAST ensures that every line of your code contributes to a resilient, secure digital ecosystem.

We Are Comprehensive, Not Superficial

We don’t just rely on scanning tools; we combine automation + manual expertise for maximum accuracy.

Certified Security Experts

Contextual Reporting

Developer-Focused Collaboration

Integration with DevSecOps

Security must start where the code starts.

Where SAST Fits in Your SDLC

SAST is most effective when integrated early and continuously. Here’s how it
fits into the modern DevSecOps lifecycle:

SDLC Diagram

Design Phase

Identify insecure design patterns.

Maintenance Phase

Continuously monitor updates and dependencies.

Development Phase

Detects vulnerabilities as code is written.

Deployment Phase

Ensure secure configurations.

Testing Phase

Validate fixes before integration.

SDLC Diagram

Design Phase

Identify insecure design patterns.

SDLC Diagram

Design Phase

Identify insecure design patterns.

SDLC Diagram

Design Phase

Identify insecure design patterns.

SDLC Diagram

Design Phase

Identify insecure design patterns.

SDLC Diagram

Design Phase

Identify insecure design patterns.

“No matter your industry, if you’re shipping software, SAST is non-negotiable.”

Industries That Benefit from SAST

BFSI

BFSI

Healthcare

Healthcare

E-Commerce and Retail

E-Commerce and Retail

Telecom and IT

Telecom and IT

Government and Defense

Government and Defense

Integrate Security. Reduce Risk. Build Trust.

FAQs

What is Static Application Security Testing (SAST)?

SAST scans an application’s source code or binaries to detect security flaws early in the SDLC, before the app goes live.

It helps find and fix vulnerabilities during coding, reducing breach risks, compliance issues, and remediation costs.

SAST automates code scanning, Secure Code Review adds manual analysis, and SCA detects risks in open-source components.

Yes. SAST tools integrate with CI/CD systems to run continuous security checks on every code change.

Kratikal combines automation and expert review to deliver accurate findings, faster fixes, and compliance-ready code.

Loading...